Enter ticker symbol or keyword:

The followings are the latest reports: Report Description Update Price How To Find The Best Style ETFs - Actionable research leveraging our rigorous analysis of the Notes to the Financial Statements. Combining our forensic accounting analysis with financial statement analysis reveals important discrepancies between reported and actual profits. These discrepancies compel quick investment actions to help investors resolve disconnects between market prices and true values before the rest of the market. 05/22/13 $50.00 Adobe PDF format, 5 pages, 63K bytes. Preview select How To Avoid The Worst Sector ETFs - Actionable research leveraging our rigorous analysis of the Notes to the Financial Statements. Combining our forensic accounting analysis with financial statement analysis reveals important discrepancies between reported and actual profits. These discrepancies compel quick investment actions to help investors resolve disconnects between market prices and true values before the rest of the market. 05/20/13 $50.00 Adobe PDF format, 5 pages, 67K bytes. Preview select How to Find the Best Sector ETFs - Actionable research leveraging our rigorous analysis of the Notes to the Financial Statements. Combining our forensic accounting analysis with financial statement analysis reveals important discrepancies between reported and actual profits. These discrepancies compel quick investment actions to help investors resolve disconnects between market prices and true values before the rest of the market. 05/17/13 $50.00 Adobe PDF format, 4 pages, 57K bytes. Preview select Low Cost Funds Dupe Investors: 2Q13 - Comparison of AUM in funds with attractive holdings versus attractive costs. Distribution of ETFs and Mutual Funds by Predictive Rating and our two component ratings. Commentary on the shortcomings of traditional ETF and Mutual Fund research. 05/14/13 $50.00 Adobe PDF format, 5 pages, 71K bytes. Preview select Most Attractive Stocks For May 2013 - 8 new stocks make our May lists. FREE Company Valuation Reports for 2 of the new stocks are in the Free Archive on our website. The Most Attractive Stocks portfolio (+4.4%) outperformed the S&P 500 (+2.8%) last month. Figure 1 shows the 22 stocks that outperformed from April's report. Most Attractive Stocks have high and rising returns on capital (ROIC) and low market expectations for future profits. Barron's recently highlighted our stock-picking as amongst the best of all Wall Street firms. See our website for details. 05/09/13 $125.00 Adobe PDF format, 11 pages, 484K bytes. Preview select Most Dangerous Stocks For May 2013 - 7 new stocks make our May lists. FREE Company Valuation Reports for 2 of the new stocks are in the Free Archive on our website. The Dangerous Stocks (+2.8%) rose less than the S&P 500 (+2.8%) and outperformed as a short portfolio last month. Figure 1 shows the 21 stocks from April's report that outperformed as shorts. Most Dangerous Stocks have misleading earnings, which means reported earnings are rising while true economic earnings are declining. Barron's recently highlighted our stock-picking as amongst the best of all Wall Street firms. See our website for details. 05/09/13 $125.00 Adobe PDF format, 10 pages, 473K bytes. Preview select Best & Worst ETFs & Mutual Funds: Small Cap Value Style - Lists of the Best and Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds in the Small Cap Value Style. Distribution of all Small Cap Value Style ETFs and Mutual Funds across our Predictive Rating Scale. Ratings are based on rigorous analysis of the profitability and valuation of each fund's holdings. Our rating system is forward-looking and does not rely on past performance. 05/07/13 $50.00 Adobe PDF format, 6 pages, 161K bytes. Preview select Best and Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds: Mid Cap Growth Style - Lists of the Best and Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds in the Mid Cap Growth Style. Distribution of all Mid Cap Growth Style ETFs and Mutual Funds across our Predictive Rating Scale. Ratings are based on rigorous analysis of the profitability and valuation of each fund's holdings. Our rating system is forward-looking and does not rely on past performance. 05/03/13 $50.00 Adobe PDF format, 6 pages, 95K bytes. Preview select Best and Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds: Mid Cap Value Style - Lists of the Best and Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds in the Mid Cap Value Style. Distribution of all Mid Cap Value Style ETFs and Mutual Funds across our Predictive Rating Scale. Ratings are based on rigorous analysis of the profitability and valuation of each fund's holdings. Our rating system is forward-looking and does not rely on past performance. 05/03/13 $50.00 Adobe PDF format, 6 pages, 95K bytes. Preview select Best and Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds: Small Cap Growth Style - Lists of the Best and Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds in the Small Cap Growth Style. Distribution of all Small Cap Growth Style ETFs and Mutual Funds across our Predictive Rating Scale. Ratings are based on rigorous analysis of the profitability and valuation of each fund's holdings. Our rating system is forward-looking and does not rely on past performance. 05/03/13 $50.00 Adobe PDF format, 6 pages, 93K bytes. Preview select Best and Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds: Small Cap Blend Style - Lists of the Best and Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds in the Small Cap Blend Style. Distribution of all Small Cap Blend Style ETFs and Mutual Funds across our Predictive Rating Scale. Ratings are based on rigorous analysis of the profitability and valuation of each fund's holdings. Our rating system is forward-looking and does not rely on past performance. 05/03/13 $50.00 Adobe PDF format, 6 pages, 94K bytes. Preview select Best and Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds: All Cap Growth Style - Lists of the Best and Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds in the All Cap Growth Style. Distribution of all All Cap Growth Style ETFs and Mutual Funds across our Predictive Rating Scale. Ratings are based on rigorous analysis of the profitability and valuation of each fund's holdings. Our rating system is forward-looking and does not rely on past performance. 05/02/13 $50.00 Adobe PDF format, 6 pages, 92K bytes. Preview select Best & Worst ETFs & Mutual Funds: Large Cap Value Style - Lists of the Best and Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds in the Large Cap Value Style. Distribution of all Large Cap Value Style ETFs and Mutual Funds across our Predictive Rating Scale. Ratings are based on rigorous analysis of the profitability and valuation of each fund's holdings. Our rating system is forward-looking and does not rely on past performance. 05/02/13 $50.00 Adobe PDF format, 6 pages, 165K bytes. Preview select Best and Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds: All Cap Value Style - Lists of the Best and Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds in the All Cap Value Style. Distribution of all All Cap Value Style ETFs and Mutual Funds across our Predictive Rating Scale. Ratings are based on rigorous analysis of the profitability and valuation of each fund's holdings. Our rating system is forward-looking and does not rely on past performance. 05/02/13 $50.00 Adobe PDF format, 6 pages, 93K bytes. Preview select Best & Worst ETFs & Mutual Funds: All Cap Blend Style - Lists of the Best and Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds in the All Cap Blend Style. Distribution of all All Cap Blend Style ETFs and Mutual Funds across our Predictive Rating Scale. Ratings are based on rigorous analysis of the profitability and valuation of each fund's holdings. Our rating system is forward-looking and does not rely on past performance. 05/02/13 $50.00 Adobe PDF format, 6 pages, 160K bytes. Preview select Best & Worst ETFs & Mutual Funds: Large Cap Growth Style - Lists of the Best and Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds in the Large Cap Growth Style. Distribution of all Large Cap Growth Style ETFs and Mutual Funds across our Predictive Rating Scale. Ratings are based on rigorous analysis of the profitability and valuation of each fund's holdings. Our rating system is forward-looking and does not rely on past performance. 05/02/13 $50.00 Adobe PDF format, 6 pages, 157K bytes. Preview select Best and Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds: Mid Cap Blend Style - Lists of the Best and Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds in the Mid Cap Blend Style. Distribution of all Mid Cap Blend Style ETFs and Mutual Funds across our Predictive Rating Scale. Ratings are based on rigorous analysis of the profitability and valuation of each fund's holdings. Our rating system is forward-looking and does not rely on past performance. 05/02/13 $50.00 Adobe PDF format, 6 pages, 96K bytes. Preview select Best & Worst ETFs & Mutual Funds: Large Cap Blend Style - Lists of the Best and Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds in the Large Cap Blend Style. Distribution of all Large Cap Blend Style ETFs and Mutual Funds across our Predictive Rating Scale. Ratings are based on rigorous analysis of the profitability and valuation of each fund's holdings. Our rating system is forward-looking and does not rely on past performance. 04/26/13 $50.00 Adobe PDF format, 6 pages, 160K bytes. Preview select Investment Style Rankings For ETFs & Mutual Funds - Select Type Ratings and Rankings for ETFs and Mutual Funds. Distribution of ETFs and Mutual Funds by Predictive Rating. Ratings are based on rigorous analysis of the profitability and valuation of each fund's holdings. Our rating system is forward-looking and does not rely on past performance. 04/25/13 $50.00 Adobe PDF format, 10 pages, 389K bytes. Preview select Rating Breakdown: Best & Worst ETFs & Mutual Funds by Style - Best & Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds in each Style by: Predictive Rating, Portfolio Management Rating, Total Annual Costs Rating Ratings are based on rigorous analysis of the profitability and valuation of each fund's holdings Our rating system is forward-looking and does not rely on past performance 04/25/13 $50.00 Adobe PDF format, 8 pages, 95K bytes. Preview select After checked box "Order Now" for the reports you want to order, click below button to add selected reports to your shopping cart.

For research questions, please contact New Constructs. For order or billing problems, please contact ValuEngine.

® 2003-2011 New Constructs, LLC This site is powered by ValuEngine Inc.